高级搜索

光谱法与传统荧光法测量北京大气NO2浓度及其对臭氧生成效率的影响

,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

葛宝珠, 王自发, 孙业乐, 董华斌, 吉东升, 刘颖, 江琪. 光谱法与传统荧光法测量北京大气NO2浓度及其对臭氧生成效率的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2014, 33(9): 1558-1565. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.09.016
引用本文: 葛宝珠, 王自发, 孙业乐, 董华斌, 吉东升, 刘颖, 江琪. 光谱法与传统荧光法测量北京大气NO2浓度及其对臭氧生成效率的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2014, 33(9): 1558-1565. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.09.016
shu
GE Baozhu, WANG Zifa, SUN Yele, DONG Huabin, JI Dongsheng, LIU Ying, JIANG Qi. Comparison between cavity attenuated phase shift spectroscopy (CAPS) and chemiluminescence-based (CL) instrument in NO2 measurement in Beijing, China[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2014, 33(9): 1558-1565. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.09.016
Citation: GE Baozhu, WANG Zifa, SUN Yele, DONG Huabin, JI Dongsheng, LIU Ying, JIANG Qi. Comparison between cavity attenuated phase shift spectroscopy (CAPS) and chemiluminescence-based (CL) instrument in NO2 measurement in Beijing, China[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2014, 33(9): 1558-1565. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.09.016
shu

光谱法与传统荧光法测量北京大气NO2浓度及其对臭氧生成效率的影响

  • 1.

    中国科学院大气物理研究所, 大气边界层物理和大气化学国家重点实验室, 北京, 100029;

  • 2.

    国家气候中心, 中国气象局气候研究开放实验室, 北京, 100081;

  • 3.

    南京信息工程大学, 中国气象局气溶胶与云降水重点开放实验室, 南京, 210044

  • 基金项目:

    中国科学院先导B类专项（XDB05020501，XDB05030203）；国家自然科学基金（41305113）资助.

Comparison between cavity attenuated phase shift spectroscopy (CAPS) and chemiluminescence-based (CL) instrument in NO2 measurement in Beijing, China

  • 1.

    State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Beijing, 100029, China;

  • 2.

    Laboratory for Climate Studies National Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing, 100081, China;

  • 3.

    Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 利用腔衰减相移式NO2光谱仪（CAPS）和传统化学荧光法（CL）同时测量北京2012年8月21—29日大气NO2浓度变化.对比两种仪器的NO2浓度，两种仪器结果在白天光化学反应较强期间偏差较大，最高可达25%.结合O3以及NOy观测计算了臭氧生成效率（OPEx），结果显示CAPS仪器结果计算得出的OPEx比CL小40%.对比低浓度和高浓度O3时期，前者差异小于后者，说明准确的NO2浓度测量对OPEx的计算至关重要，在O3污染期间尤为重要，是影响臭氧敏感性控制指标的一个显著因素.
    Abstract: Compared to the commercially standard chemiluminescence-based (CL) NOx analyzers, which often have high uncertainty due to the interference of reactive nitrogen species, the Cavity attenuated phase shift spectroscopy (CAPS) monitor shows much enhanced performance in detecting the ambient gaseous nitrogen dioxide (NO2). In this study, both instruments were deployed in Beijing during 21—29 August 2012.The NO2 measured by CAPS shows overall agreement with that by CL, yet large difference up to 25% was also observed in the afternoon. As a result, the calculated ozone production efficiency of NOx (OPEx) derived from the correlations of Ox-NOz with the CL NO2 can be overestimation by 40% in Beijing. This overestimation could be significant in high O3 polluted period and implicate the important impact on the O3 sensitivity indicator.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Chameides W L, Fehsenfeld F, Rodgers M O, et al. Ozone precursor relationships in the ambient atmosphere[J]. J Geophys Res, 1992, 97: 6037-6055
    [2] St John J C, Chameides W L, Sayor R. Role of anthropogenic NOx and VOC as ozone precursors: A case study from the SOS Nashville/middle Tennessee Ozone study[J]. J Geophys Res, 1998, 103: 22415-22423
    [3] Sillman S. The relationship between ozone, NOx and hydrocarbons in urban and polluted rural environments[J]. Atmos Environ, 1999, 33: 1821-1845
    [4] Richter A, Burrows J P, Nuss H, et al. Increase in tropospheric nitrogen dioxide over China observed from space[J]. Nature, 2005, 437(7055): 129-132
    [5] Streets D G, Bond T C, Carmichael G R, et al. An inventory of gaseous and primary aerosol emissions in Asia in the year 2000[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 2003, 108(D21) DOI: 10.1029/2002JD003093
    [6] Martin R V, Sioris C E, Chance K, et al. Evaluation of space-based constraints on global nitrogen oxide emissions with regional aircraft measurements over and downwind of eastern North America[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 2006, 111(D15) DOI: 10.1029/2005JD006680
    [7] 葛宝珠, 徐晓斌, 林伟立, 等. 上甸子本底站臭氧生成效率的观测研究[J]. 环境科学, 2010, 31(7): 1444-1450
    [8] Kebabian P L, Herndon S C, Freedman A. Detection of nitrogen dioxide by cavity attenuated phase shift spectroscopy[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2005, 77(2): 724-728
    [9] Fehsenfeld F C, Drummond J W, Roychowdhury U K, et al. Intercomparison of NO2 measurement techniques[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 1990, 95(D4): 3579-3597
    [10] Gerboles M, Lagler F, Rembges D, et al. Assessment of uncertainty of NO2 measurements by the chemiluminescence method and discussion of the quality objective of the NO2 European directive[J]. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 2003, 5(4): 529-540
    [11] Dunlea E J, Herndon S C, Nelson D D, et al. Evaluation of nitrogen dioxide chemiluminescence monitors in a polluted urban environment[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2007, 7(10): 2691-2704
    [12] Steinbacher M, Zellweger C, Schwarzenbach B, et al. Nitrogen oxide measurements at rural sites in Switzerland: Bias of conventional measurement techniques[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 2007, 112(D11) DOI: 10.1029/2006JD007971
    [13] Kebabian P L, Wood E C, Herndon S C, et al. A practical alternative to chemiluminescence-based detection of nitrogen dioxide: Cavity attenuated phase shift spectroscopy[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(16): 6040-6045
    [14] Liu S C, Trainer M, Fehnsenfeld F C. Ozone production in the rural troposphere and the implications for regional and global ozone distributions[J]. J Geophys Res, 1987, 92: 4191-4207
    [15] Trainer M, Ridley B A, Buhr M P, et al. Regional ozone and urban plumes in the southeastern United States: Birmingham, a case study[J]. J Geophys Res, 1995, 100: 18823-18834
    [16] Nunnermacker L J, Imre D, Daum P H, et al. Characterization of the Nashville urban plume on July 3 and July 18, 1995[J]. J Geophys Res, 1998, 103: 28129-28148
    [17] 刘洁, 张小玲, 谢璞, 等. 上甸子区域本底站大气痕量活性气体的变化规律[J]. 环境化学, 2007, 26(5): 693-698
    [18] Lin W, Xu X, Zhang X, et al. Contributions of pollutants from North China Plain to surface ozone at the Shangdianzi GAW Station[J]. Atmos Chem Phys, 2008, 8: 5889-5898
    [19] Sun Y L, Wang Z F, Dong H B, et al. Characterization of summer organic and inorganic aerosols in Beijing, China with an Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2012, 51: 250-259
    [20] Fitz D R, Bumiller K, Lashgari A. Measurement of NOY during the SCOS97-NARSTO[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2003, 37: S119-S134
    [21] 董芬, 王喜全, 王自发, 等.北京地区大气污染分布的"南北两重天"现象[J]. 气候与环境研究, 2013, 18(1): 63-70
    [22] Volkamer R, Molina L T, Molina M J, et al. DOAS measurement of glyoxal as an indicator for fast VOC chemistry in urban air[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2005, 32(8) DOI:10.1029/2005GL022616
    [23] Li X, Brauers T, Hofzumahaus A, et al. MAX-DOAS measurements of NO2, HCHO and CHOCHO at a rural site in Southern China[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2013, 13(4): 2133-2151
    [24] Ge B, Sun Y, Liu Y, et al. Nitrogen dioxide measurement by cavity attenuated phase shift spectroscopy (CAPS) and implications in ozone production efficiency and nitrate formation in Beijing, China[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2013: 118(16):9499-9509
    [25] Lin W, Xu X, Ge B, et al. Characteristics of gaseous pollutants at Gucheng, a rural site southwest of Beijing[J]. J Geophys Res, 2009, 114(4): 1-17
    [26] Lin W, Xu X, Ge B, et al. Gaseous pollutants in Beijing urban area during the heating period 2007—2008: Variability, sources, meteorological, and chemical impacts[J]. Atmos Chem Phys, 2011, 11(15): 8157-8170
    [27] Wang T, Nie W, Gao J, et al. Air quality during the 2008 Beijing Olympics: Secondary pollutants and regional impact[J]. Atmos Chem Phys, 2010, 10(16): 7603-7615
    [28] Sun Y, Wang L L, Wang Y S, et al. In situ measurements of SO2, NOx, NOy, and O3 in Beijing, China during August 2008[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2011, 409(5): 933-940
    [29] Chou C C K, Tsai C Y, Chang C C, et al. Photochemical production of ozone in Beijing during the 2008 Olympic Games[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2011, 11(18): 9825-9837
    [30] Wang T, Ding A, Gao J, et al. Strong ozone production in urban plumes from Beijing, China[J]. Geophys Res Lett, 2006, 33(21): L21806
    [31] Kleinman L I, Daum P H, Imre D G, et al. Ozone production in the New York City urban plume[J]. J Geophys Res, 2000, 105: 14495-14511
    [32] Ge B Z, Xu X B, Lin W L, et al. Impact of the regional transport of urban Beijing pollutants on downwind areas in summer: Ozone production efficiency analysis[J]. Tellus B, 2012, 64: 17348-17351
    [33] Sillman S. The use of NOy, H2O2 and HNO3 as indicators for ozone-NOx-hydrocarbon sensitivity in urban locations[J]. J Geophys Res, 1995, 100: 14175-14188
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1096
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1096
  • PDF下载数:  1324
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2013-12-20
葛宝珠, 王自发, 孙业乐, 董华斌, 吉东升, 刘颖, 江琪. 光谱法与传统荧光法测量北京大气NO2浓度及其对臭氧生成效率的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2014, 33(9): 1558-1565. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.09.016
引用本文: 葛宝珠, 王自发, 孙业乐, 董华斌, 吉东升, 刘颖, 江琪. 光谱法与传统荧光法测量北京大气NO2浓度及其对臭氧生成效率的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2014, 33(9): 1558-1565. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.09.016
shu
GE Baozhu, WANG Zifa, SUN Yele, DONG Huabin, JI Dongsheng, LIU Ying, JIANG Qi. Comparison between cavity attenuated phase shift spectroscopy (CAPS) and chemiluminescence-based (CL) instrument in NO2 measurement in Beijing, China[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2014, 33(9): 1558-1565. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.09.016
Citation: GE Baozhu, WANG Zifa, SUN Yele, DONG Huabin, JI Dongsheng, LIU Ying, JIANG Qi. Comparison between cavity attenuated phase shift spectroscopy (CAPS) and chemiluminescence-based (CL) instrument in NO2 measurement in Beijing, China[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2014, 33(9): 1558-1565. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.09.016
shu

光谱法与传统荧光法测量北京大气NO2浓度及其对臭氧生成效率的影响

  • 1.  中国科学院大气物理研究所, 大气边界层物理和大气化学国家重点实验室, 北京, 100029;
  • 2.  国家气候中心, 中国气象局气候研究开放实验室, 北京, 100081;
  • 3.  南京信息工程大学, 中国气象局气溶胶与云降水重点开放实验室, 南京, 210044
  • 收稿日期:  2013-12-20
基金项目:

中国科学院先导B类专项（XDB05020501，XDB05030203）；国家自然科学基金（41305113）资助.

摘要: 利用腔衰减相移式NO2光谱仪（CAPS）和传统化学荧光法（CL）同时测量北京2012年8月21—29日大气NO2浓度变化.对比两种仪器的NO2浓度，两种仪器结果在白天光化学反应较强期间偏差较大，最高可达25%.结合O3以及NOy观测计算了臭氧生成效率（OPEx），结果显示CAPS仪器结果计算得出的OPEx比CL小40%.对比低浓度和高浓度O3时期，前者差异小于后者，说明准确的NO2浓度测量对OPEx的计算至关重要，在O3污染期间尤为重要，是影响臭氧敏感性控制指标的一个显著因素.

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (33)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心