摘要:
蜜蜂数量的下降,一部分原因是由于农药的使用,尤其是杀虫剂的使用,该问题引起了全球的关注。大多数研究都关注蜜蜂和大黄蜂体内杀虫剂的残留,而作为野外重要的传粉者独居蜂则鲜有研究。大多数非蜜蜂属蜜蜂是独居的,且常在地面或树洞里筑巢,因此它们所接触的杀虫剂暴露途径不同于蜜蜂和大黄蜂。我们分析了20种杀虫剂在日本2个地区的4个苹果园中所采集到的角额壁蜂(Osmia cornifrons)、所传花粉和筑巢材料,以及成年蜜蜂、土壤和野花中的残留。成年蜜蜂、花粉和野花中都很少有杀虫剂。果园中施用的杀虫剂检出频率很高:在几乎所有的样品中都检测到氯虫苯甲酰胺、氟苯虫酰胺和二嗪农。无已知使用史的杀虫剂也从各种样品中被检测到,频率从0%到100%不等。即使在没有已知杀虫剂使用史的果园中,也在许多样品类型中检测到高浓度的噻虫胺。紫色荨麻样品中的浓度最高,为17.5 mg/kg。这些结果都强调了环境中杀虫剂对角额壁蜂暴露途径的复杂性,因为杀虫剂可能会在环境中停留很长时间并且野生蜜蜂可能会在比已知的距离更远的地方觅食。此外,每类样品都检测出不同的杀虫剂,因此野生蜜蜂可能在不同的生命阶段暴露于不同的杀虫剂。未来的研究应优先考虑大规模检测野外的杀虫剂残留量,并且对目标物种的不同生命阶段进行重复性暴露的毒性测试。
原文链接:https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5635
Abstract:
Declines in bee populations, in part due to pesticides, especially insecticides, are of global concern. Although most studies have investigated insecticide residues in honeybees and bumblebees, few have focused on non-Apis solitary bees, which are considered essential pollinators in the field. Most non-Apis bees are solitary and build their nests in the ground or in tree holes, therefore insecticide exposure pathways would differ from those of honeybees and bumblebees. We analyzed the residues of 20 insecticides in Osmia cornifrons bees and their pollen-provisions and nesting materials, along with adult honeybees, soil, and wildflowers collected in four apple orchards in two regions in Japan. Few insecticides were common among adult bees, pollen-provisions, and wildflowers. Insecticides applied in orchards were detected at high frequency:chlorantraniliprole, flubendiamide, and diazinon were detected in almost all samples. Insecticides without a known history of application were detected from various samples at frequencies ranging from 0% to 100%. Even in orchards without a known history of insecticide application, clothianidin was detected in many sample types and at high concentration. A purple deadnettle sample had the highest concentration at 17.5 mg/kg. These results highlight the complexity of pathways of insecticide exposure to O. cornifrons in the environment because insecticides may remain in the environment for long periods and wild bees may forage farther than previously known distances. Furthermore, each sample type contained different insecticides, so wild bees may have been exposed to different insecticides at different life stages. Future research should prioritize wide-scale measurements of insecticide residues in field conditions and toxicity testing with multiple exposures at different life stages of target species.
View more in https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5635