高级搜索

乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和乙二胺二琥珀酸(EDDS)对 污染土壤中Cd、Pb的浸提效果及其风险评估

,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

赵娜, 崔岩山, 付彧, 谢建治. 乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和乙二胺二琥珀酸(EDDS)对 污染土壤中Cd、Pb的浸提效果及其风险评估[J]. 环境化学, 2011, 30(5): 958-963.
引用本文: 赵娜, 崔岩山, 付彧, 谢建治. 乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和乙二胺二琥珀酸(EDDS)对 污染土壤中Cd、Pb的浸提效果及其风险评估[J]. 环境化学, 2011, 30(5): 958-963.
shu
ZHAO Na, CUI Yanshan, FU Yu, XIE Jianzhi. LEACHING OF Cd AND Pb FROM A CONTAMINATED SOIL WITH EDTA AND EDDS: EFFECTIVENESS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2011, 30(5): 958-963.
Citation: ZHAO Na, CUI Yanshan, FU Yu, XIE Jianzhi. LEACHING OF Cd AND Pb FROM A CONTAMINATED SOIL WITH EDTA AND EDDS: EFFECTIVENESS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2011, 30(5): 958-963.
shu

乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和乙二胺二琥珀酸(EDDS)对 污染土壤中Cd、Pb的浸提效果及其风险评估

  • 1.

    河北农业大学资源与环境科学学院, 保定, 071000;

  • 2.

    中国科学院研究生院, 北京, 100049

  • 基金项目:

    国家高技术研究发展计划(863)项目(2008AA06Z336)资助.

LEACHING OF Cd AND Pb FROM A CONTAMINATED SOIL WITH EDTA AND EDDS: EFFECTIVENESS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT

  • 1.

    College of Resources and Environmental Science Agriculture University of Hebei, Baoding, 071000, China;

  • 2.

    Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, 100049, China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 为了研究EDTA和EDDS对污染土壤中Cd、Pb的去除效果和去除后土壤中Cd、Pb的风险,利用不同浓度的EDTA和EDDS(0、5、10、20、30、50 mmol·L-1)对污染土壤中Cd、Pb进行浸提,并利用in vitro 方法(人工模拟胃肠系统)对浸提后的土壤进行风险评估.结果表明,EDTA对Cd的去除率显著高于EDDS,EDTA对Cd的去除率最高为82.4%;EDDS对Cd的去除率最高为46.8%.在5—30 mmol·L-1范围内,同浓度下,EDDS对Pb去除显著高于EDTA,两种螯合剂在50 mmol·L-1时对Pb的去除无显著差异.in vitro 实验表明污染土壤浸提后Cd、Pb的生物可给性显著降低.经EDDS浸提后Cd的生物可给性低于EDTA浸提后, Pb的生物可给性高于EDTA浸提后的结果.
    Abstract: Effectiveness and health risk assessment of Cd and Pb in soil was studied in a contaminated soil after remediation with EDTA and EDDS. In vitro method (artificial gastrointestinal system) was used to evaluate the health risk. The results showed that Cd and Pb removal increased significantly with increasing concentration of EDTA and EDDS. Cd removal by EDTA was significantly higher than that of EDDS. The highest Cd removal rate was 82.4% with EDTA and 46.8% with EDDS. Pb removal by EDTA was significantly higher than that of EDDS in the 5—30 mmol·L-1 treatments. However, no difference in Pb removal was observed between two chelating agents in 50 mmol·L-1. In vitro experiments showed that the concentrations of dissolved Cd and Pb in the gastric and small intestinal phase were reduced after leaching with the chelating agents. The bioaccessiblity of Cd after EDDS leaching was lower than EDTA. However, the bioaccessiblity of Pb after EDDS leaching was higher than that of EDTA leaching. The results will provide some information about remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils with EDTA and EDDS and their health risk assessment.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 钱暑强,刘铮.污染土壤修复技术介绍[J].化工进展,2000,20(4):10-12
    [2] 周涛,易海涛,陆晓华.模拟重金属污染土壤的强化解吸与解吸液降解[J].环境科学与技术,2010,33(4):45-48
    [3] 雷鸣,田中干也,廖柏寒等.EDTA及其回收溶液治理重金属污染土壤的研究[J].环境工程学报,2007,5:88-93
    [4] Peters R W.Chelant extraction of heavy metals from contaminated soils[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,1999,66:151-210
    [5] Grcman H,Vodnik D,Velikonja-Boltas,et al.As a new chelant for environmentally safe enhanced lead phytoextraction[J].Environmental Quality,2003,32:500-506
    [6] Kos B,Le tan D.Induced phytoextraction/soil washing of lead using biodegradable chelant and permeable barriers [J].Environmental Science and Technology,2003,37:624-629
    [7] Luo Chunling,Shen Zhenguo,Li Xiangdong.Enhanced phytoextraction of Cu,Pb,Zn and Cd with EDTA and EDDS [J].Chemosphere,2005,59:1-11
    [8] Tandy S,Ammann A,Schulin R,et al.Biodegradation and speciation of residual SS-ethylenediaminedisuccinic acid (EDDS) in soil solution left after soil washing[J].Environmental Pollution,2006,142:191-199
    [9] 孙云云,赵兰坡. 土壤质量评价的生物指标及其相关性研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(5):116-120
    [10] Schroder J L,Basta N T,Si J.In vitro gastrointestinal method to estimate relative bioavailable cadmium in contaminated soil [J].Environmental Science Technology,2003,37 (7):1365-1370
    [11] 崔岩山,陈晓晨.土壤中镉的生物可给性及其对人体的健康风险评估[J].环境科学,2010,31(2):403-407
    [12] Ruby M V,Davis A,Kempton J H,et al.Lead bioavailability:dissolution kinetics under simulated gastric conditions[J].Environmental Science and Technology,1992,26(6):1242-1248
    [13] Rodriguez R R,Basta N T,Casteel S W,et al.An in vitro gastrointestinal method to estimate bioavailable arsenic in contaminated soil and solid media[J].Environmental Science and Technology,1999,33:642-649
    [14] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析(第三版) [M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000
    [15] 鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000
    [16] 胡忻,罗璐瑕.生物可降解的螯合剂EDDS提取城市污泥中Cu,Zn,Pb和Cd[J].环境科学研究,2007,20(6):110-114
    [17] 许超,夏北城,林颖.EDTA 和柠檬酸对污染土壤中重金属的解吸动力学及其形态的影响[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(4):146-151
    [18] Cao Alessia,Cappai Giovanna,Carucci Alessandra,et al.Heavy metal bioavailability and chelate mobilization efficiency in an assisted phytoextraction process[J]. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2008,30:115-119
    [19] 丁竹红,胡忻,尹大强.土壤中重金属-乙二胺二琥珀酸浸提及其对重金属形态分布的影响[J].环境化学,2009,28(3):339-342
    [20] Dane T Lamb,Hui Ming,Mallavarapu Megharaj,et al. Heavy metal (Cu,Zn,Cd and Pb) partitioning and bioaccessibility in uncontaminated and long-term contaminated soils[J]﹒Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009,171:1150-1158
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  988
  • HTML全文浏览数:  939
  • PDF下载数:  445
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2010-06-04
赵娜, 崔岩山, 付彧, 谢建治. 乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和乙二胺二琥珀酸(EDDS)对 污染土壤中Cd、Pb的浸提效果及其风险评估[J]. 环境化学, 2011, 30(5): 958-963.
引用本文: 赵娜, 崔岩山, 付彧, 谢建治. 乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和乙二胺二琥珀酸(EDDS)对 污染土壤中Cd、Pb的浸提效果及其风险评估[J]. 环境化学, 2011, 30(5): 958-963.
shu
ZHAO Na, CUI Yanshan, FU Yu, XIE Jianzhi. LEACHING OF Cd AND Pb FROM A CONTAMINATED SOIL WITH EDTA AND EDDS: EFFECTIVENESS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2011, 30(5): 958-963.
Citation: ZHAO Na, CUI Yanshan, FU Yu, XIE Jianzhi. LEACHING OF Cd AND Pb FROM A CONTAMINATED SOIL WITH EDTA AND EDDS: EFFECTIVENESS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2011, 30(5): 958-963.
shu

乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和乙二胺二琥珀酸(EDDS)对 污染土壤中Cd、Pb的浸提效果及其风险评估

  • 1.  河北农业大学资源与环境科学学院, 保定, 071000;
  • 2.  中国科学院研究生院, 北京, 100049
  • 收稿日期:  2010-06-04
基金项目:

国家高技术研究发展计划(863)项目(2008AA06Z336)资助.

摘要: 为了研究EDTA和EDDS对污染土壤中Cd、Pb的去除效果和去除后土壤中Cd、Pb的风险,利用不同浓度的EDTA和EDDS(0、5、10、20、30、50 mmol·L-1)对污染土壤中Cd、Pb进行浸提,并利用in vitro 方法(人工模拟胃肠系统)对浸提后的土壤进行风险评估.结果表明,EDTA对Cd的去除率显著高于EDDS,EDTA对Cd的去除率最高为82.4%;EDDS对Cd的去除率最高为46.8%.在5—30 mmol·L-1范围内,同浓度下,EDDS对Pb去除显著高于EDTA,两种螯合剂在50 mmol·L-1时对Pb的去除无显著差异.in vitro 实验表明污染土壤浸提后Cd、Pb的生物可给性显著降低.经EDDS浸提后Cd的生物可给性低于EDTA浸提后, Pb的生物可给性高于EDTA浸提后的结果.

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (20)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心