Krishna G, Goel S, Krishna K A. Alternative Animal Toxicity Testing and Biomarkers [M]//Biomarkers in Toxicology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2014: 129-147
Prior H, Casey W, Kimber I, et al. Reflections on the progress towards non-animal methods for acute toxicity testing of chemicals [J]. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2019, 102: 30-33
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Report on considerations from case studies on integrated approaches for testing and assessment (IATA) [R]. Paris: Environment, Health and Safety Division, Environment Directorate, OECD, 2021
Parish S T, Aschner M, Casey W, et al. An evaluation framework for new approach methodologies (NAMs) for human health safety assessment [J]. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2020, 112: 104592
Richard A M, Judson R S, Houck K A, et al. ToxCast chemical landscape: Paving the road to 21st Century toxicology [J]. Chemical Research in Toxicology, 2016, 29(8): 1225-1251
Hsieh N H, Chen Z W, Rusyn I, et al. Risk characterization and probabilistic concentration-response modeling of complex environmental mixtures using new approach methodologies (NAMs) data from organotypic in vitro human stem cell assays [J]. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2021, 129(1): 17004
World Health Organization. Principles and methods for the risk assessment of chemicals in food [R]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2012
Bessems J G, Loizou G, Krishnan K, et al. PBTK modelling platforms and parameter estimation tools to enable animal-free risk assessment: Recommendations from a joint EPAA-EURL ECVAM ADME workshop [J]. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2014, 68(1): 119-139
National Research Council (NRC). Toxicity testing in the 21st Century: A vision and a strategy [R]. Washington DC: Committee on Toxicity Testing and Assessment of Environmental Agents, National Research Council, 2007
Pletz J, Blakeman S, Paini A, et al. Physiologically based kinetic (PBK) modelling and human biomonitoring data for mixture risk assessment [J]. Environment International, 2020, 143: 105978
管娜, 朱斌, 赵申升, 等. 生理动力学模型及其在健康风险评估中的应用进展和展望[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2024, 19(4): 1-12 Guan N, Zhu B, Zhao S S, et al. The development and future prospective of physiologically based kinetic models and its applications in risk assessment [J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2024, 19(4): 1-12 (in Chinese)
Bell S M, Chang X Q, Wambaugh J F, et al. In vitro to in vivo extrapolation for high throughput prioritization and decision making [J]. Toxicology in vitro, 2018, 47: 213-227
Chang X Q, Tan Y M, Allen D G, et al. IVIVE: Facilitating the use of in vitro toxicity data in risk assessment and decision making [J]. Toxics, 2022, 10(5): 232
王广基, 刘晓东, 柳晓泉. 药物代谢动力学[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2005: 235
East A, Dawson D E, Brady S, et al. A scoping assessment of implemented toxicokinetic models of per- and polyfluoro-alkyl substances, with a focus on one-compartment models [J]. Toxics, 2023, 11(2): 163
Galetin A. Rationalizing Underprediction of Drug Clearance from Enzyme and Transporter Kinetic Data: From in vitro Tools to Mechanistic Modeling [M]// Nagar S, Argikar U A, Tweedie D J. Enzyme Kinetics in Drug Metabolism: Fundamentals and Applications. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2014: 255-288
Yoon M, Clewell H J 3rd. Addressing early life sensitivity using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and in vitro to in vivo extrapolation [J]. Toxicological Research, 2016, 32(1): 15-20
Kuepfer L, Niederalt C, Wendl T, et al. Applied concepts in PBPK modeling: How to build a PBPK/PD model [J]. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, 2016, 5(10): 516-531
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Guidance document on the characterisation, validation and reporting of physiologically based kinetic (PBK) models for regulatory purposes [R]. Paris: Environment, Health and Safety Division, Environment Directorate, OECD, 2021
Yoon H, Kim T H, Lee B C, et al. Comparison of the exposure assessment of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate between the PBPK model-based reverse dosimetry and scenario-based analysis: A Korean general population study [J]. Chemosphere, 2022, 294: 133549
Kolli A R, Kuczaj A K, Martin F, et al. Bridging inhaled aerosol dosimetry to physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling for toxicological assessment: Nicotine delivery systems and beyond [J]. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 2019, 49(9): 725-741
Tebby C, Caudeville J, Fernandez Y, et al. Mapping blood lead levels in French children due to environmental contamination using a modeling approach [J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 808: 152149
Wetmore B A. Quantitative in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation in a high-throughput environment [J]. Toxicology, 2015, 332: 94-101
Silva M H. Use of Computational Toxicology Tools to Predict in vivo Endpoints [M]// Gupta R C. Reproductive and Developmental Toxicology (Third Edition). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2022: 127-146
Linakis M W, Sayre R R, Pearce R G, et al. Development and evaluation of a high throughput inhalation model for organic chemicals [J]. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 2020, 30(5): 866-877
张浩然, 杨道远, 欧瞳, 等. 化学物危害特征描述中不确定系数制定的研究进展及其应用[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2024, 19(2): 1-11 Zhang H R, Yang D Y, Ou T, et al. Research advances and practical applications of uncertainty factors using in chemical hazard characterization [J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2024, 19(2): 1-11 (in Chinese)
Schroeder K, Bremm K D, Alépée N, et al. Report from the EPAA workshop: in vitro ADME in safety testing used by EPAA industry sectors [J]. Toxicology in vitro, 2011, 25(3): 589-604
Sager J E, Yu J J, Ragueneau-Majlessi I, et al. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling and simulation approaches: A systematic review of published models, applications, and model verification [J]. Drug Metabolism and Disposition: the Biological Fate of Chemicals, 2015, 43(11): 1823-1837
Li R, Barton H A, Yates P D, et al. A “middle-out” approach to human pharmacokinetic predictions for OATP substrates using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling [J]. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, 2014, 41(3): 197-209
Tsamandouras N, Rostami-Hodjegan A, Aarons L. Combining the 'bottom up’ and 'top down’ approaches in pharmacokinetic modelling: Fitting PBPK models to observed clinical data [J]. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2015, 79(1): 48-55
Xie R L, Wang X D, Xu Y P, et al. In vitro to in vivo extrapolation for predicting human equivalent dose of phenolic endocrine disrupting chemicals: PBTK model development, biological pathways, outcomes and performance [J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 897: 165271
Barton H A, Chiu W A, Setzer R W, et al. Characterizing uncertainty and variability in physiologically based pharmacokinetic models: State of the science and needs for research and implementation [J]. Toxicological Sciences, 2007, 99(2): 395-402
Loizou G, Spendiff M, Barton H A, et al. Development of good modelling practice for physiologically based pharmacokinetic models for use in risk assessment: The first steps [J]. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2008, 50(3): 400-411
Gueorguieva I, Aarons L, Ogungbenro K, et al. Optimal design for multivariate response pharmacokinetic models [J]. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, 2006, 33(2): 97-124
Cho K H, Shin S Y, Kolch W, et al. Experimental design in systems biology, based on parameter sensitivity analysis using a Monte Carlo method: A case study for the TNFα-mediated NF-κB signal transduction pathway [J]. SIMULATION, 2003, 79(12): 726-739
Babich M A. Risk assessment of low-level chemical exposures from consumer products under the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission chronic hazard guidelines [J]. Environmental Health Perspectives, 1998, 106(Suppl.1): 387-390
Sarigiannis D A, Karakitsios S, Dominguez-Romero E, et al. Physiology-based toxicokinetic modelling in the frame of the European Human Biomonitoring Initiative [J]. Environmental Research, 2019, 172: 216-230
Nguyen H Q, Stamatis S D, Kirsch L E. A novel method for assessing drug degradation product safety using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models and stochastic risk assessment [J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2015, 104(9): 3101-3119
Yang X X, Doerge D R, Teeguarden J G, et al. Development of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for assessment of human exposure to bisphenol A [J]. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 2015, 289(3): 442-456
Crowell S R, Amin S G, Anderson K A, et al. Preliminary physiologically based pharmacokinetic models for benzopyrene and dibenzochrysene in rodents [J]. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 2011, 257(3): 365-376
Loccisano A E, Longnecker M P, Campbell J L Jr, et al. Development of PBPK models for PFOA and PFOS for human pregnancy and lactation life stages [J]. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part A, 2013, 76(1): 25-57
Tonnelier A, Coecke S, Zaldívar J M. Screening of chemicals for human bioaccumulative potential with a physiologically based toxicokinetic model [J]. Archives of Toxicology, 2012, 86(3): 393-403
Kunze A, Huwyler J, Poller B, et al. In vitro -in vivo extrapolation method to predict human renal clearance of drugs [J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2014, 103(3): 994-1001
Wambaugh J F, Hughes M F, Ring C L, et al. Evaluating in vitro-In vivo extrapolation of toxicokinetics [J]. Toxicological Sciences, 2018, 163(1): 152-169
Rotroff D M, Wetmore B A, Dix D J, et al. Incorporating human dosimetry and exposure into high-throughput in vitro toxicity screening [J]. Toxicological Sciences, 2010, 117(2): 348-358
Aylward L L, Hays S M. Consideration of dosimetry in evaluation of ToxCastTM data [J]. Journal of Applied Toxicology, 2011, 31(8): 741-751
Abdo N, Wetmore B A, Chappell G A, et al. In vitro screening for population variability in toxicity of pesticide-containing mixtures [J]. Environment International, 2015, 85: 147-155
Wambaugh J F, Wetmore B A, Ring C L, et al. Assessing toxicokinetic uncertainty and variability in risk prioritization [J]. Toxicological Sciences, 2019, 172(2): 235-251
Louisse J, Bosgra S, Blaauboer B J, et al. Prediction of in vivo developmental toxicity of all-trans-retinoic acid based on in vitro toxicity data and in silico physiologically based kinetic modeling [J]. Archives of Toxicology, 2015, 89(7): 1135-1148
Fabian E, Gomes C, Birk B, et al. In vitro -to-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) by PBTK modeling for animal-free risk assessment approaches of potential endocrine-disrupting compounds [J]. Archives of Toxicology, 2019, 93(2): 401-416
Davidsen A B, Mardal M, Holm N B, et al. Ketamine analogues: Comparative toxicokinetic in vitro-in vivo extrapolation and quantification of 2-fluorodeschloroketamine in forensic blood and hair samples [J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2020, 180: 113049
Sipes N S, Wambaugh J F, Pearce R, et al. An intuitive approach for predicting potential human health risk with the Tox21 10k library [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 51(18): 10786-10796
Lin Y J, Lin Z M. In vitro -in silico-based probabilistic risk assessment of combined exposure to bisphenol A and its analogues by integrating ToxCast high-throughput in vitro assays with in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) via physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 399: 122856
El-Masri H, Kleinstreuer N, Hines R N, et al. Integration of life-stage physiologically based pharmacokinetic models with adverse outcome pathways and environmental exposure models to screen for environmental hazards [J]. Toxicological Sciences, 2016, 152(1): 230-243
Xie R L, Xu Y P, Ma M, et al. First metabolic profiling of 4-n-nonylphenol in human liver microsomes by integrated approaches to testing and assessment: Metabolites, pathways, and biological effects [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2023, 447: 130830
Valdiviezo A, Luo Y S, Chen Z W, et al. Quantitative in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation for mixtures: A case study of Superfund Priority List pesticides [J]. Toxicological Sciences, 2021, 183(1): 60-69
Leonard J A, Tan Y M, Gilbert M, et al. Estimating margin of exposure to thyroid peroxidase inhibitors using high-throughput in vitro data, high-throughput exposure modeling, and physiologically based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling [J]. Toxicological Sciences, 2016, 151(1): 57-70
Liu Y, Jing R Y, Wen Z N, et al. Narrowing the gap between in vitro and in vivo genetic profiles by deconvoluting toxicogenomic data in silico [J]. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2020, 10: 1489
Tong S S, Sun H, Xue C F, et al. Establishment and assessment of a novel in vitro bio-PK/PD system in predicting the in vivo pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cyclophosphamide [J]. Xenobiotica, 2018, 48(4): 368-375
European Commission (EC). PARCroute Roadmap1 [R]. Belgium: European Commission, 2023
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). The use of alternatives to testing on animals for the REACH Regulation [R]. Helsinki, Finland: European Chemicals Agency, 2023
Strikwold M, Spenkelink B, Woutersen R A, et al. Development of a combined in vitro physiologically based kinetic (PBK) and Monte Carlo modelling approach to predict interindividual human variation in phenol-induced developmental toxicity [J]. Toxicological Sciences, 2017, 157(2): 365-376
Campbell J L, Andersen M E, Clewell H J. A hybrid CFD-PBPK model for naphthalene in rat and human with IVIVE for nasal tissue metabolism and cross-species dosimetry [J]. Inhalation Toxicology, 2014, 26(6): 333-344
Martin S A, McLanahan E D, Bushnell P J, et al. Species extrapolation of life-stage physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models to investigate the developmental toxicology of ethanol using in vitro to in vivo (IVIVE) methods [J]. Toxicological Sciences, 2015, 143(2): 512-535
Ring C L, Pearce R G, Setzer R W, et al. Identifying populations sensitive to environmental chemicals by simulating toxicokinetic variability [J]. Environment International, 2017, 106: 105-118
Wetmore B A, Allen B, Clewell H J 3rd, et al. Incorporating population variability and susceptible subpopulations into dosimetry for high-throughput toxicity testing [J]. Toxicological Sciences, 2014, 142(1): 210-224
Browne P, Casey W M, Dix D J. Use of High-Throughput and Computational Approaches for Endocrine Pathway Screening [M]//Garcia-Reyero N, Murphy C A. A Systems Biology Approach to Advancing Adverse Outcome Pathways for Risk Assessment. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018: 15-29
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). New approach methods work plan (v2) [R]. Washington DC, USA: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2021
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Use of new approach methodologies to derive extrapolation factors and evaluate developmental neurotoxicity for human health risk assessment [R]. Washington DC, USA: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2020
Durmowicz A G, Lim R, Rogers H, et al. The U.S. food and drug administration’s experience with ivacaftor in cystic fibrosis. Establishing efficacy using in vitro data in lieu of a clinical trial [J]. Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2018, 15(1): 1-2
Zhang X Y, Yang Y, Grimstein M, et al. Application of PBPK modeling and simulation for regulatory decision making and its impact on US prescribing information: An update on the 2018-2019 submissions to the US FDA’s office of clinical pharmacology [J]. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2020, 60(Suppl.1): S160-S178
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Guidance document on good in vitro method practices (GIVIMP) [R]. Paris: OECD, 2018
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Test No. 319A: Determination of in vitro intrinsic clearance using cryopreserved rainbow trout hepatocytes (RT-HEP) [R]. Paris: OECD, 2018
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Test No. 319B: Determination of in vitro intrinsic clearance using rainbow trout liver S9 sub-cellular fraction (RT-S9) [R]. Paris: OECD, 2018
曹正颖, 姚欣雅, 赵敏娴, 等. 大鼠经胃和皮下暴露毒死蜱的毒物代谢动力学和毒效学模型构建[J]. 中国药理学与毒理学杂志, 2016, 30(1): 74-81 Cao Z Y, Yao X Y, Zhao M X, et al. A physiologically based toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics model in rats following both oral and subcutaneous exposure to chlorpyrifos [J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 2016, 30(1): 74-81 (in Chinese)
梁颖, 丁莹, 张留圈, 等. 氰戊菊酯生理毒物代谢动力学模型的建立[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2015, 10(3): 170-176 Liang Y, Ding Y, Zhang L Q, et al. Physiologically based toxicokinetic model for fenvalerate in mice [J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2015, 10(3): 170-176 (in Chinese)
王阳, 刘茂. 基于生理毒代动力学模型对氯乙烯暴露后人体内剂量的求解[J]. 工业卫生与职业病, 2009, 35(5): 280-284 Wang Y, Liu M. Solution of internal doses for inhaled vinyl chloride by physiologically based toxicokinetic (PBTK) model [J]. Industrial Health and Occupational Diseases, 2009, 35(5): 280-284 (in Chinese)
姚欣雅, 赵敏娴, 曹正颖, 等. 结合体质量生长函数的幼年大鼠毒死蜱经口暴露PBTK/TD模型的研究[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2015, 27(4): 249-259 Yao X Y, Zhao M X, Cao Z Y, et al. A physiologically based toxicokinetic/toxicodynamic model with growth function of the juvenile rat following the oral exposure to chlorpyrifos [J]. Carcinogenesis, Teratogenesis & Mutagenesis, 2015, 27(4): 249-259 (in Chinese)
Liu H T, Gan Z Q, Qin X Y, et al. Advances in microfluidic technologies in organoid research [J]. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2023, 1: e2302686