| Moura-Alves P, Faé K, Houthuys E, et al. AhR sensing of bacterial pigments regulates antibacterial defence[J]. Nature, 2014, 512(7515):387-392 |
| 魏凤华, 张俊江, 夏普, 等. 类二噁英物质及芳香烃受体(AhR)介导的有害结局路径(AOP)研究进展[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2016, 11(1):37-51 Wei F H, Zhang J J, Xia P, et al. Research progress on dioxin-like compounds and AhR-mediated adverse outcome pathway (AOP)[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2016, 11(1):37-51(in Chinese) |
| Kennedy G D, Nukaya M, Moran S M, et al. Liver tumor promotion by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin is dependent on the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and TNF/IL-1 receptors[J]. Toxicological Sciences, 2014, 140(1):135-143 |
| Perkins E J, Ashauer R, Burgoon L, et al. Building and applying quantitative adverse outcome pathway models for chemical hazard and risk assessment[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2019, 38(9):1850-1865 |
| Pavek P, Dvorak Z. Xenobiotic-induced transcriptional regulation of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes of the cytochrome P450 superfamily in human extrahepatic tissues[J]. Current Drug Metabolism, 2008, 9(2):129-143 |
| Fujii-Kuriyama Y, Kawajiri K. Molecular mechanisms of the physiological functions of the aryl hydrocarbon (dioxin) receptor, a multifunctional regulator that senses and responds to environmental stimuli[J]. Proceedings of the Japan Academy Series B, Physical and Biological Sciences, 2010, 86(1):40-53 |
| Hahn M E. Aryl hydrocarbon receptors:Diversity and evolution[J]. Chemico-Biological Interactions, 2002, 141(1-2):131-160 |
| Karchner S I, Franks D G, Powell W H, et al. Regulatory interactions among three members of the vertebrate aryl hydrocarbon receptor family:AHR repressor, AHR1, and AHR2[J]. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2002, 277(9):6949-6959 |
| Koh D H, Hwang J H, Park J G, et al. The AHR1-ARNT1 dimerization pair is a major regulator of the response to natural ligands, but not to TCDD, in the chicken[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2020, 201:110835 |
| Doering J A, Giesy J P, Wiseman S, et al. Predicting the sensitivity of fishes to dioxin-like compounds:Possible role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) ligand binding domain[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2013, 20(3):1219-1224 |
| Hahn M E. Dioxin toxicology and the aryl hydrocarbon receptor:Insights from fish and other non-traditional models[J]. Marine Biotechnology, 2001, 3(Suppl.1):S224-S238 |
| Zhang S K, Peng P G, Huang W L, et al. PCDD/PCDF pollution in soils and sediments from the Pearl River Delta of China[J]. Chemosphere, 2009, 75(9):1186-1195 |
| Zhang T, Chen S, Li N, et al. Occurrence, sources and ecological risks of PCDD/Fs and DL-PCBs in surface sediments from rivers in city cluster in south Jiangsu Province, China[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2014, 33(9):1445-1455 |
| Klinčić D, Dvoršćak M, Jagić K, et al. Levels and distribution of polybrominated diphenyl ethers in humans and environmental compartments:A comprehensive review of the last five years of research[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2020, 27(6):5744-5758 |
| Kanaya N, Bernal L, Chang G, et al. Molecular mechanisms of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (BDE-47, BDE-100, and BDE-153) in human breast cancer cells and patient-derived xenografts[J]. Toxicological Sciences, 2019, 169(2):380-398 |
| Zhang L, Jin Y R, Han Z H, et al. Integrated in silico and in vivo approaches to investigate effects of BDE-99 mediated by the nuclear receptors on developing zebrafish[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2018, 37(3):780-787 |
| Zhang R, Zhang X W, Zhang J J, et al. Activation of avian aryl hydrocarbon receptor and inter-species sensitivity variations by polychlorinated diphenylsulfides[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(18):10948-10956 |
| Zhang J J, Zhang X W, Xia P, et al. Activation of AhR-mediated toxicity pathway by emerging pollutants polychlorinated diphenyl sulfides[J]. Chemosphere, 2016, 144:1754-1762 |
| Ankley G T, Bennett R S, Erickson R J, et al. Adverse outcome pathways:A conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2010, 29(3):730-741 |
| Hecker M, LaLone C A. Adverse outcome pathways:Moving from a scientific concept to an internationally accepted framework[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2019, 38(6):1152-1163 |
| Poland A, Knutson J C. 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and related halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons:Examination of the mechanism of toxicity[J]. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 1982, 22:517-554 |
| Conolly R B, Ankley G T, Cheng W Y, et al. Quantitative adverse outcome pathways and their application to predictive toxicology[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 51(8):4661-4672 |
| Pittman M E, Edwards S W, Ives C, et al. AOP-DB:A database resource for the exploration of adverse outcome pathways through integrated association networks[J]. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 2018, 343:71-83 |
| Teraoka H, Okuno Y, Nijoukubo D, et al. Involvement of COX2-thromboxane pathway in TCDD-induced precardiac edema in developing zebrafish[J]. Aquatic Toxicology, 2014, 154:19-26 |
| Lanham K A, Plavicki J, Peterson R E, et al. Cardiac myocyte-specific AHR activation phenocopies TCDD-induced toxicity in zebrafish[J]. Toxicological Sciences, 2014, 141(1):141-154 |
| Smith A G, Clothier B, Carthew P, et al. Protection of the Cyp1a2(-/-) null mouse against uroporphyria and hepatic injury following exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin[J]. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 2001, 173(2):89-98 |
| Doering J A, Wiseman S, Giesy J P, et al. A cross-species quantitative adverse outcome pathway for activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor leading to early life stage mortality in birds and fishes[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52(13):7524-7533 |
| Kim Y, Cooper K R. Toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the embryos and newly hatched larvae of the Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes)[J]. Chemosphere, 1999, 39(3):527-538 |
| Handel C M, van Hemert C. Environmental contaminants and chromosomal damage associated with beak deformities in a resident North American passerine[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2015, 34(2):314-327 |
| Mylchreest E, Charbonneau M. Studies on the mechanism of uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase inhibition in hexachlorobenzene-induced Porphyria in the female rat[J]. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 1997, 145(1):23-33 |
| James C A, Marks G S. Inhibition of chick embryo hepatic uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase by components of xenobiotic-treated chick embryo hepatocytes in culture[J]. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 1989, 67(3):246-249 |
| Doering J A, Wiseman S, Beitel S C, et al. Identification and expression of aryl hydrocarbon receptors (AhR1 and AhR2) provide insight in an evolutionary context regarding sensitivity of white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) to dioxin-like compounds[J]. Aquatic Toxicology, 2014, 150:27-35 |
| Zhang R, Manning G E, Farmahin R, et al. Relative potencies of aroclor mixtures derived from avian in vitro bioassays:Comparisons with calculated toxic equivalents[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(15):8852-8861 |
| Mandavia C. TCDD-induced activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor regulates the skin stem cell population[J]. Medical Hypotheses, 2015, 84(3):204-208 |
| 魏凤华, 张效伟, 张睿, 等. 鸟类AhR报告基因法对垃圾焚烧炉飞灰中的类二噁英污染物的评估[J]. 中国科技论文, 2016, 11(15):1791-1796 Wei F H, Zhang X W, Zhang R, et al. Assessment of the dioxin-like compounds in fly ash of the waste incinerator by avian AhR luciferase report gene assay[J]. China Sciencepaper, 2016, 11(15):1791-1796(in Chinese) |
| 夏洁. 二恶英类污染物的高通量生物检测技术研究及其在环境监测中的应用[D]. 南京:南京大学, 2013:21-31 Xia J. Development of a high throughput bio-analytical method of dioxin-like compounds and its application in environmental monitoring[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing University, 2013:21 -31(in Chinese) |
| Mundy L J, Williams K L, Chiu S, et al. Extracts of passive samplers deployed in variably contaminated wetlands in the athabasca oil sands region elicit biochemical and transcriptomic effects in avian hepatocytes[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(15):9192-9202 |
| Doering J A, Dubiel J, Wiseman S. Predicting early life stage mortality in birds and fishes from exposure to low-potency agonists of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor:A cross-species quantitative adverse outcome pathway approach[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2020, 39(10):2055-2064 |
| Manning G E, Farmahin R, Crump D, et al. A luciferase reporter gene assay and aryl hydrocarbon receptor 1 genotype predict the LD50 of polychlorinated biphenyls in avian species[J]. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 2012, 263(3):390-401 |
| Manning G E, Mundy L J, Crump D, et al. Cytochrome P4501A induction in avian hepatocyte cultures exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls:Comparisons with AHR1-mediated reporter gene activity and in ovo toxicity[J]. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 2013, 266(1):38-47 |
| Peng Y, Xia P, Zhang J J, et al. Toxicogenomic assessment of 6-OH-BDE47-induced developmental toxicity in chicken embryos[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(22):12493-12503 |
| Farmahin R, Wu D M, Crump D, et al. Sequence and in vitro function of chicken, ring-necked pheasant, and Japanese quail AHR1 predict in vivo sensitivity to dioxins[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(5):2967-2975 |
| Farmahin R, Manning G E, Crump D, et al. Amino acid sequence of the ligand-binding domain of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor 1 predicts sensitivity of wild birds to effects of dioxin-like compounds[J]. Toxicological Sciences, 2013, 131(1):139-152 |
| Karchner S I, Franks D G, Kennedy S W, et al. The molecular basis for differential dioxin sensitivity in birds:Role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006, 103(16):6252-6257 |
| Cohen-Barnhouse A M, Zwiernik M J, Link J E, et al. Sensitivity of Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica), Common pheasant (Phasianus colchicus), and White leghorn chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) embryos to in ovo exposure to TCDD, PeCDF, and TCDF[J]. Toxicological Sciences, 2011, 119(1):93-103 |
| Head J A, Hahn M E, Kennedy S W. Key amino acids in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor predict dioxin sensitivity in avian species[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(19):7535-7541 |
| Goryo K, Suzuki A, Carpio C A D, et al. Identification of amino acid residues in the Ah receptor involved in ligand binding[J]. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2007, 354(2):396-402 |
| Ema M, Ohe N, Suzuki M, et al. Dioxin binding activities of polymorphic forms of mouse and human arylhydrocarbon receptors[J]. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1994, 269(44):27337-27343 |
| Pandini A, Denison M S, Song Y J, et al. Structural and functional characterization of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand binding domain by homology modeling and mutational analysis[J]. Biochemistry, 2007, 46(3):696-708 |
| Abnet C C, Tanguay R L, Hahn M E, et al. Two forms of aryl hydrocarbon receptor type 2 in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss):Evidence for differential expression and enhancer specificity[J]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1999, 274(21):15159-15166 |
| Zhang R, Wang X X, Zhang X S, et al. Polychlorinated diphenylsulfides activate aryl hydrocarbon receptor 2 in zebrafish embryos:Potential mechanism of developmental toxicity[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52(7):4402-4412 |
| White D H, Hoffman D J. Effects of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans on nesting wood ducks (Aix sponsa) at Bayou Meto, Arkansas[J]. Environmental Health Perspectives, 1995, 103(Suppl.4):37-39 |
| Fujisawa N, Nakayama S M M, Ikenaka Y, et al. TCDD-induced chick cardiotoxicity is abolished by a selective cyclooxygenase-2(COX-2) inhibitor NS398[J]. Archives of Toxicology, 2014, 88(9):1739-1748 |
| Dong W, Matsumura F, Kullman S W. TCDD induced pericardial edema and relative COX-2 expression in medaka (Oryzias latipes) embryos[J]. Toxicological Sciences, 2010, 118(1):213-223 |
| Doering J A, Farmahin R, Wiseman S, et al. Differences in activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptors of white sturgeon relative to lake sturgeon are predicted by identities of key amino acids in the ligand binding domain[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(7):4681-4689 |
| Tillitt D E, Buckler J A, Nicks D K, et al. Sensitivity of lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) early life stages to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and 3,3',4,4',5-pentachlorobiphenyl[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2017, 36(4):988-998 |
| Gunnarsson L, Jauhiainen A, Kristiansson E, et al. Evolutionary conservation of human drug targets in organisms used for environmental risk assessments[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(15):5807-5813 |
| LaLone C A, Villeneuve D L, Lyons D, et al. Editor's highlight:Sequence alignment to predict across species susceptibility (SeqAPASS):A web-based tool for addressing the challenges of cross-species extrapolation of chemical toxicity[J]. Toxicological Sciences, 2016, 153(2):228-245 |
| Zhang R, Zhang J J, Zhang X W, et al. In vitro dioxin-like potencies of HO-and MeO-PBDEs and inter-species sensitivity variation in birds[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2016, 126:202-210 |
| Walker M K, Cook P M, Butterworth B C, et al. Potency of a complex mixture of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin, dibenzofuran, and biphenyl congeners compared to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in causing fish early life stage mortality[J]. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology:Official Journal of the Society of Toxicology, 1996, 30(2):178-186 |
| Wei F H, Li J Y, Zhang R, et al. Relative sensitivities among avian species to individual and mixtures of aryl hydrocarbon receptor-active compounds[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2016, 35(5):1239-1246 |
| Patlewicz G, Simon T W, Rowlands J C, et al. Proposing a scientific confidence framework to help support the application of adverse outcome pathways for regulatory purposes[J]. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2015, 71(3):463-477 |