高级搜索

土壤微生物群落结构分析中磷脂脂肪酸法和温和碱性甲酯化法的比较及定量优化

,  ,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

任慧琴, 赵念席, 陈磊, 高玉葆. 土壤微生物群落结构分析中磷脂脂肪酸法和温和碱性甲酯化法的比较及定量优化[J]. 环境化学, 2014, 33(5): 760-764. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.05.008
引用本文: 任慧琴, 赵念席, 陈磊, 高玉葆. 土壤微生物群落结构分析中磷脂脂肪酸法和温和碱性甲酯化法的比较及定量优化[J]. 环境化学, 2014, 33(5): 760-764. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.05.008
shu
REN Huiqin, ZHAO Nianxi, CHEN Lei, GAO Yubao. Comparison of phospholipid fatty acid method and mild alkaline methylesterefication method in characterizing soil microbial communities and quantitative optimization[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2014, 33(5): 760-764. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.05.008
Citation: REN Huiqin, ZHAO Nianxi, CHEN Lei, GAO Yubao. Comparison of phospholipid fatty acid method and mild alkaline methylesterefication method in characterizing soil microbial communities and quantitative optimization[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2014, 33(5): 760-764. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.05.008
shu

土壤微生物群落结构分析中磷脂脂肪酸法和温和碱性甲酯化法的比较及定量优化

  • 1.

    南开大学生命科学学院, 天津, 300071

  • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金项目（31270463）资助.

Comparison of phospholipid fatty acid method and mild alkaline methylesterefication method in characterizing soil microbial communities and quantitative optimization

  • 1.

    College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 分别用磷脂脂肪酸法（PLFA）和温和碱性甲酯化法（EL）对同一土壤样品脂肪酸（FAs）进行提取，结果表明，EL法提取到更多种类的短链和长链FAs，且总FAs含量是PLFA法的3倍；两种方法提取的细菌、真菌和放线菌的相对含量存在显著差异.此外，在定量计算时，基于“内标对比法”与“直接计算法”计算值之间的差异得到校正系数K，用于定量值的校正.经检验，借助校正系数可使定量结果更准确.
    Abstract: In the present study, fatty acids (FAs) were extracted from soil samples by bothphospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) method and mild alkaline methylesterefication(EL) method. More kinds of both short and long chain FAs, and 2-fold higher total FAs content were extracted by EL method than by PLFA method. Relative content of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetesshowed significantly different between the two methods (PK was defined based on the variance between quantitation values that calculated by "internal standard correlation method" and "direct calculation method", then was used to correct values that calculated by "direct calculation method". The results showed thatcorrection values were more accurate than values calculated by "direct calculation method".
  • 加载中
  • [1] 贺纪正, 李晶, 郑袁明. 土壤生态系统微生物多样性-稳定性关系的思考[J]. 生物多样性, 2013, 21(4): 411-420
    [2] Vestal J R, White D C. Lipid analysis in microbial ecology[J]. Bioscience, 1989, 39(8): 535- 541
    [3] Drenovsky R E, Steenwerth K L, Jackson L E, et al. Land use and climatic factors structure regional patterns in soil microbial communities[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2010, 19(1): 27-39
    [4] García O, Fuensanta M, Alicia M S, et al. Effects of different agricultural managements in soil microbial community structure in a semi-arid Mediterranean region[J]. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 2012, 15: 9489
    [5] Fernández D A, Roldán A, Azcón R, et al. Effects of water stress, organic amendment and mycorrhizal inoculation on soil microbial community structure and activity during the establishment of two heavy metal-tolerant native plant species[J]. Microb Ecology, 2012, 63(4): 794-803
    [6] Fernandes M F, Saxena J, Dick R P. Comparison of whole-cell fatty acid (MIDI) or phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) extractants as biomarkers to profile soil microbial communities[J]. Microb Ecology, 2013, 66(1): 145-157
    [7] Feng X, Simpson A J, Schlesinger W H, et al. Altered microbial community structure and organic matter composition under elevated CO2 and N fertilization in the duke forest[J]. Global Change Biology, 2010, 16(7): 2104-2116
    [8] Bligh E G, Dyer W J. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification[J]. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology, 1959, 37(8): 911- 917
    [9] Schutter M E, Dick R P. Comparison of fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) methods for characterizing microbial communities[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2000, 64(5): 1659-1668
    [10] Drenovsky R E, Elliott G N, Graham K J, et al. Comparison of phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) and total soil fatty acid methyl esters (TSFAME) for characterizing soil microbial communities[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2004, 36(11): 1793-1800
    [11] 孙毓庆, 胡育筑, 吴玉田, 等. 分析化学[M]. 科学出版社, 2006: 504-507
    [12] 黄玉娟, 陈永山, 骆永明, 等. 气相色谱-质谱联用内标法测定土壤中11种酞酸酯[J]. 环境化学, 2013, 32(4): 658-665
    [13] 肖刚, 李丽君, 杨柳, 等. 气相色谱-质谱法同时测定地下水中55 种挥发性有机物[J]. 环境化学, 2012, 31(12): 2024-2025
    [14] Sharma S K, Ramesh A, Sharma M P, et al. Microbial community structure and diversity as indicators for evaluating soil quality[M]. Biodiversity, Biofuels, Agroforestry and Conservation Agriculture, 2011, 5: 317-358
    [15] 白震, 张明, 闫颖, 等. 长期施肥对农田黑土微生物活力与群落结构的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2009, 46(1): 107-116
    [16] Hunneman D H, Eglinton G.. The constituent acids of gymnosperm cutins[J]. Phytochemistry, 1972, 11(6): 1989-2001
    [17] Kolattukudy P E. Biopolyester membranes of plants: Cutin and suberin[J]. Science, 1980, 208: 990-1000
    [18] 张瑞娟, 李华, 林勤保, 等. 土壤微生物群落表征中磷脂脂肪酸(PLFA)方法研究进展[J]. 山西农业科学, 2011, 39(9): 1020-1024
    [19] Bååth E. The use of neutral lipid fatty acids to indicate the physiological conditions of soil fungi[J]. Microbial Ecology, 2003, 45(4): 373-383
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1832
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1832
  • PDF下载数:  915
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2013-07-14
任慧琴, 赵念席, 陈磊, 高玉葆. 土壤微生物群落结构分析中磷脂脂肪酸法和温和碱性甲酯化法的比较及定量优化[J]. 环境化学, 2014, 33(5): 760-764. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.05.008
引用本文: 任慧琴, 赵念席, 陈磊, 高玉葆. 土壤微生物群落结构分析中磷脂脂肪酸法和温和碱性甲酯化法的比较及定量优化[J]. 环境化学, 2014, 33(5): 760-764. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.05.008
shu
REN Huiqin, ZHAO Nianxi, CHEN Lei, GAO Yubao. Comparison of phospholipid fatty acid method and mild alkaline methylesterefication method in characterizing soil microbial communities and quantitative optimization[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2014, 33(5): 760-764. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.05.008
Citation: REN Huiqin, ZHAO Nianxi, CHEN Lei, GAO Yubao. Comparison of phospholipid fatty acid method and mild alkaline methylesterefication method in characterizing soil microbial communities and quantitative optimization[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2014, 33(5): 760-764. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.05.008
shu

土壤微生物群落结构分析中磷脂脂肪酸法和温和碱性甲酯化法的比较及定量优化

  • 1. 南开大学生命科学学院, 天津, 300071
  • 收稿日期:  2013-07-14
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目（31270463）资助.

摘要: 分别用磷脂脂肪酸法（PLFA）和温和碱性甲酯化法（EL）对同一土壤样品脂肪酸（FAs）进行提取，结果表明，EL法提取到更多种类的短链和长链FAs，且总FAs含量是PLFA法的3倍；两种方法提取的细菌、真菌和放线菌的相对含量存在显著差异.此外，在定量计算时，基于“内标对比法”与“直接计算法”计算值之间的差异得到校正系数K，用于定量值的校正.经检验，借助校正系数可使定量结果更准确.

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (19)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心