高级搜索

不同pH的柠檬酸对茶园土壤溶出液中氟组分变化的影响

,  , 

downloadPDF

上一篇

下一篇

营浩, 张显晨, 郜红建. 不同pH的柠檬酸对茶园土壤溶出液中氟组分变化的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2014, 33(11): 1885-1892. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.11.013
引用本文: 营浩, 张显晨, 郜红建. 不同pH的柠檬酸对茶园土壤溶出液中氟组分变化的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2014, 33(11): 1885-1892. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.11.013
shu
YING Hao, ZHANG Xianchen, GAO Hongjian. Variation of fluoride composition in tea garden soil leachate under citric acid of different pH[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2014, 33(11): 1885-1892. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.11.013
Citation: YING Hao, ZHANG Xianchen, GAO Hongjian. Variation of fluoride composition in tea garden soil leachate under citric acid of different pH[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2014, 33(11): 1885-1892. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.11.013
shu

不同pH的柠檬酸对茶园土壤溶出液中氟组分变化的影响

  • 1.

    安徽农业大学资源与环境学院, 合肥, 230036;

  • 2.

    安徽农业大学茶叶生物化学与生物技术教育部重点实验室, 合肥, 230036

  • 基金项目:

    国家自然科学基金(31272254)

    安徽省杰出青年科学基金(1408085J01)资助.

Variation of fluoride composition in tea garden soil leachate under citric acid of different pH

  • 1.

    School of Resources and Environment, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China;

  • 2.

    Key laboratory of Tea Biochemical and Biological Technology, Ministry of Education, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China

  • Fund Project:

  • 摘要: 通过连续流动搅拌法,研究了不同pH的柠檬酸对茶园土壤溶出液中氟组分变化的影响.结果表明,土壤溶出液的pH随溶出时间的延长而逐渐减小.土壤溶出液中的游离态氟和总氟的浓度随时间的延长和柠檬酸pH的升高而逐渐减小,且呈现初始(0-6 h)溶出浓度较高,而后(6-10 h)逐渐减缓的趋势.土壤氟的溶出过程用一级动力学方程、Elovich方程、扩散方程和双常数方程均有较好的拟合,决定系数(R2)均大于0.90.低pH(pH 3.5)条件下,F主要以H-F形态存在,随着pH的升高(pH 4.0-5.0),H-F形态的氟减小,Al-F络合态的氟增多,且随时间延长,溶出浓度均降低.反应开始的前1 h,Al-F络合物主要以AlF3为主,占氟溶出总量的90%以上;至7 h时,AlF2+的溶出量逐渐增大,并逐渐超过AlF3.低pH的柠檬酸促进土壤游离态氟和总氟的溶出,有利于络合态氟的形成,但对Al-F络合物的形态转化没有显著影响.
    Abstract: Variation of fluoride (F) composition in tea garden soil leachate under citric acid of different pH was studied by using the flow-stirred method. Results showed that soil solution pH decreased with the increase of reaction time. The amount of free F and total F released into soil solution increased with citric acid pH and reaction time. Moreover, the release of F from soil was initially fast and then slowed down. The concentration of F released into soil solution from 0 to 6 h was higher than from 6 to 10 h.The released of F from tea garden soil fitted the first-order reaction kinetics equation, Elovich equation, diffusion equation and double constant equation well, and the coefficient of determination (R2)were higher than 0.90.At low pH, H-F was the main form of F. The amount of Al-F complexes, released into soil solution increased, while the amount of H-F complexes released into soil solution decreased with citric acid pH. Amount of Al-F complexes and H-F complexes, decreased with the increase of reaction time. During the first 1 hour, AlF3 was the main form of Al-F complexes, accounting for 90% of the total F released from the tea garden soil. In addition, with the increase of reaction time, the amount of AlF2+ released from the tea garden soil increased and was higher than that of AlF3 after 7 hours. At low pH, citric acid promoted release of F from soil and facilitated formation of F-complexes, while it had no significant impacts on the transformation among Al-F complexes.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Cao J, Bai X X, Zhao Y, et al. The Relationship of Fluorosis and Brick Tea Drinking in Chinese Tibetans[J]. Environmental Health Perspectives, 1996, 104(12): 1340-1343
    [2] 陆英, 刘仲华. 茶叶中氟的研究进展[J]. 吉首大学学报: 自然科学版, 2004,25(4): 84-88
    [3] 谢忠雷, 邱立民, 董德明, 等. 茶叶氟含量及其影响因素[J]. 吉林大学自然科学学报, 2001 (2): 81-84
    [4] 郜红建, 金友前, 董艳红, 等. 水溶性有机质对茶园土壤氟形态的影响[J].安徽农业大学学报,2012,39(3):389-393
    [5] 李张伟. 粤东凤凰茶区茶叶和土壤氟含量状况调查及影响因素研究[J].土壤通报,2010,41(5):1222-1225
    [6] Galina A, Evdokinova. Fluorine in the Soils of the White Sea Basin and Bioindication of pollution[J]. Chemosphere, 2001, 42 (1): 35-43
    [7] Strobel B W. Influence of vegetation on low-molecular-weight carboxylic acids in soil solution:A review[J].Geoderma, 2001, 99(3/4): 169-198
    [8] 丁永祯, 李志安, 邹碧.土壤低分子量有机酸及其生态功能[J].土壤, 2005, 37 (3): 243-250
    [9] 陆建良, 梁月荣. 茶树根系特性与茶园管理[J]. 茶叶科学简报, 1994, (1): 1-5
    [10] 张福锁, 曹一平. 根际动态过程与植物营养[J]. 土壤学报,1992, 29 (3): 239-250
    [11] 杨杰文, 钟来元, 郭荣发. pH和有机酸对氟溶出砖红壤中铝离子的影响[J].环境科学研究,2011,24(2):216-221
    [12] Xu R K, Zhao A Z, Ji G L. Effect of low-molecular-weight organic anions on surface charge of variable charge soils[J].Journal of Colloid and Interface Science,2003,264(2):322-326
    [13] 胡红青, 贺纪正, 李学垣.多种有机酸共存对可变电荷土壤吸附磷的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1999, 5(2): 122-128
    [14] 沈阿林, 李学垣, 吴受容.土壤中低分子量有机酸在物质循环中的作用[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1997,3(4):363-369
    [15] 徐仁扣, 王亚云, 赵安珍. 低分子量有机酸对可变电荷土壤吸附性氟解吸的影响[J].土壤,2003, 35 (5): 392-396
    [16]
    [17]
    [18] 王代长, 蒋新, 贺纪正, 等. H+和有机酸对可变电荷土壤铝释放的动力学研究[J]. 地球化学,2006,35(6):651-659
    [19] 张显晨, 郜红建, 张正竹, 等. 铝对氟在茶树体内吸收与分配的影响[J].食品科学,2013,34(5):147-150
    [20] Gao H J, Zhang Z Z, Wan X C. Influences of charcoal and bamboo charcoal amendment on soil-fluoride fractions and bioaccumulation of fluoride in tea plants[J].Environmental Geochemistry and Health,2012,34(5):551-562
    [21] 王瑾,李小坤,鲁剑巍,等. 不同酸提取条件下几种含钾矿物中钾释放动力学研究[J].中国农业科学, 2012,45(22):4643-4650
    [22] 徐仁扣, 季国亮. 用氟离子电极测定土壤溶液中无机单核铝的实验验证[J].环境化学,1998,17(1):72-78
    [23] 徐仁扣, 季国亮. pH对酸性土壤中铝的溶出和铝离子形态分布的影响[J].土壤学报,1998,35(2):162-171
    [24] 刘伟, 尚庆昌. 长春地区不同类型土壤的缓冲性及其影响因素[J].吉林农业大学学报, 2001, 23(3): 78-82
    [25] Arnesen A K M. Fluoride solubility in dust emission from an aluminum smelter[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 1997, 26: 1564-1570
    [26] 谢忠雷, 邱立民, 董德明, 等. 茶叶中氟含量及其影响因素[J]. 吉林大学自然科学学报, 2001(2): 81-84
    [27] 喻艳红, 张桃林, 李清曼, 等. pH、离子强度和介电常数对低分子量有机酸在红壤中吸附行为的影响[J].土壤, 2010, 42 (3): 479-484
    [28] 熊明彪, 雷孝章, 田应兵, 等. 钾离子在土壤中吸附和解吸动力学研究进展[J].生态环境,2003,12(1):115-118
    [29] 赵振华, 吴玉, 蒋新, 等. 低分子量有机酸对红壤中硫丹释放动力学的影响[J].环境科学,2009,30(10):3077-3081
    [30] Fung K F, Wong M H. Effects of soil pH on the Uptake of Al,F and other elements by tea plants[J].Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2002,82:146-152
    [31] Stevens D P, McLaughlin M J, Alston A M. Phytotoxicity of hydrogen fluoride and fluoroborate and their uptake from solution culture by lycopersicon esculentum and avenasativa[J].Plant and Soil,1998,200:175-184
    [32] Anetta Zioła-Frankowska, Marcin Frankowski, Jerzy Siepak. Development of a new analytical method for online simultaneous qualitative determination of aluminium (free aluminium ion, aluminium-fluoride complexes) by HPLC-FAAS[J].Talanta,2009,78:623-630
    [33] Ding R X, Huang X. Biogeochemical cycle aluminum and fluoride in tea garden soil system and its relationship to soil acidification[J]. Acta Pedolngica Sinica, 1991, 28(3): 229-236.
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1599
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1534
  • PDF下载数:  560
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2014-01-16
  • 刊出日期:  2014-11-15
营浩, 张显晨, 郜红建. 不同pH的柠檬酸对茶园土壤溶出液中氟组分变化的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2014, 33(11): 1885-1892. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.11.013
引用本文: 营浩, 张显晨, 郜红建. 不同pH的柠檬酸对茶园土壤溶出液中氟组分变化的影响[J]. 环境化学, 2014, 33(11): 1885-1892. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.11.013
shu
YING Hao, ZHANG Xianchen, GAO Hongjian. Variation of fluoride composition in tea garden soil leachate under citric acid of different pH[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2014, 33(11): 1885-1892. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.11.013
Citation: YING Hao, ZHANG Xianchen, GAO Hongjian. Variation of fluoride composition in tea garden soil leachate under citric acid of different pH[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2014, 33(11): 1885-1892. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2014.11.013
shu

不同pH的柠檬酸对茶园土壤溶出液中氟组分变化的影响

  • 1.  安徽农业大学资源与环境学院, 合肥, 230036;
  • 2.  安徽农业大学茶叶生物化学与生物技术教育部重点实验室, 合肥, 230036
  • 收稿日期:  2014-01-16
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(31272254)

安徽省杰出青年科学基金(1408085J01)资助.

摘要: 通过连续流动搅拌法,研究了不同pH的柠檬酸对茶园土壤溶出液中氟组分变化的影响.结果表明,土壤溶出液的pH随溶出时间的延长而逐渐减小.土壤溶出液中的游离态氟和总氟的浓度随时间的延长和柠檬酸pH的升高而逐渐减小,且呈现初始(0-6 h)溶出浓度较高,而后(6-10 h)逐渐减缓的趋势.土壤氟的溶出过程用一级动力学方程、Elovich方程、扩散方程和双常数方程均有较好的拟合,决定系数(R2)均大于0.90.低pH(pH 3.5)条件下,F主要以H-F形态存在,随着pH的升高(pH 4.0-5.0),H-F形态的氟减小,Al-F络合态的氟增多,且随时间延长,溶出浓度均降低.反应开始的前1 h,Al-F络合物主要以AlF3为主,占氟溶出总量的90%以上;至7 h时,AlF2+的溶出量逐渐增大,并逐渐超过AlF3.低pH的柠檬酸促进土壤游离态氟和总氟的溶出,有利于络合态氟的形成,但对Al-F络合物的形态转化没有显著影响.

English Abstract

    全文HTML

参考文献 (33)

返回顶部

目录

/

返回文章
返回

Copyright © 2019 中国科学院生态环境研究中心