基于逼近理想解排序的江苏省优先控制毒害有机化学物质筛查研究

王伟霞, 姚烘烨, 赵静, 顾凰琳, 张丹, 刘伟. 基于逼近理想解排序的江苏省优先控制毒害有机化学物质筛查研究[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2022, 17(4): 197-212. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20211109001
引用本文: 王伟霞, 姚烘烨, 赵静, 顾凰琳, 张丹, 刘伟. 基于逼近理想解排序的江苏省优先控制毒害有机化学物质筛查研究[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2022, 17(4): 197-212. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20211109001
Wang Weixia, Yao Hongye, Zhao Jing, Gu Huanglin, Zhang Dan, Liu Wei. Screening System for Priority Control of Toxic Organic Chemicals in Jiangsu Province Based on Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2022, 17(4): 197-212. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20211109001
Citation: Wang Weixia, Yao Hongye, Zhao Jing, Gu Huanglin, Zhang Dan, Liu Wei. Screening System for Priority Control of Toxic Organic Chemicals in Jiangsu Province Based on Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2022, 17(4): 197-212. doi: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20211109001

基于逼近理想解排序的江苏省优先控制毒害有机化学物质筛查研究

    作者简介: 王伟霞(1982—),女,高级工程师,研究方向为化学品及固体废物污染防治,E-mail:wangweixia@jsep.com
    通讯作者: 刘伟, E-mail: jshblw@126.com
  • 基金项目:

    江苏省科技计划社会发展项目(BE2021731);江苏省生态环境科研课题(2020002)

  • 中图分类号: X171.5

Screening System for Priority Control of Toxic Organic Chemicals in Jiangsu Province Based on Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution

    Corresponding author: Liu Wei, jshblw@126.com
  • Fund Project:
  • 摘要: 基于“优先控制”策略,筛选高产量、高环境健康风险的毒害有机化学物质,优先开展环境管理,是有效防控毒害化学物质环境健康风险的重要手段之一。本研究结合逼近理想解排序技术(TOPSIS)、层次分析法(AHP)和熵值法(Entropy),构建了优先控制毒害有机化学物质的筛查体系,并用于确定江苏省优先控制毒害有机化学物质清单。筛查体系流程包括:(1)江苏省毒害有机化学物质清单的建立;(2)从物质的释放、暴露和危害潜力3个角度,选取17个评价指标,建立综合风险评估层次结构模型;(3)基于AHP-Entropy,计算各指标权重值;(4)利用TOPSIS开展毒害有机化学物质优先级排序,确定江苏省优先控制毒害有机化学物质清单。筛查结果显示,江苏省毒害有机化学物质257种,其中综合风险评分前5%的物质(13种)纳入江苏省优先控制毒害化学物质清单。优控清单中,11种物质已列入国内外管控名录,纳入率为84.6%。其中,蒽、邻甲苯胺、六溴环十二烷、苯、乙醛、甲醛和四氯乙烯已纳入我国优先控制化学品清单。该结果表明,本研究构建的优控毒害有机化学物质筛查体系较为合理。本研究构建的筛查体系,有助于管理部门快速识别区域优控毒害有机化学物质,为新污染物治理奠定重要基础。
  • 加载中
  • 王佳钰, 王中钰, 陈景文, 等. 环境新污染物治理与化学品环境风险防控的系统工程[J]. 科学通报, 2022, 67(3):267-277

    Wang J Y, Wang Z Y, Chen J W, et al. Environmental systems engineering consideration on treatment of emerging pollutants and risk prevention and control of chemicals[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2022, 67(3):267-277(in Chinese)

    Bu Q W, Wang D H, Wang Z J. Review of screening systems for prioritizing chemical substances[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2013, 43(10):1011-1041
    王一喆, 张亚辉, 赵莹, 等. 国内外环境优先污染物筛选排序方法比较[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2018, 8(4):456-464

    Wang Y Z, Zhang Y H, Zhao Y, et al. Comparison on screening and sorting methods of environmental priority pollutants at home and abroad[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2018, 8(4):456-464(in Chinese)

    United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Toxic and priority pollutants under the Clean Water Act[R]. Washington DC:US EPA, 1977
    Council E. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water[R]. European Community, 2000
    丁琪琪, 龚雄虎, 王兆德, 等. 基于多指标综合评分法筛选地表水环境优先污染物——以湖北涨渡湖为例[J]. 湖泊科学, 2022, 34(1):90-108

    Ding Q Q, Gong X H, Wang Z D, et al. A proposed multi-criteria scoring method for identifying priority pollutants in surface water:A case study of Lake Zhangdu, Hubei Province[J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2022, 34(1):90-108(in Chinese)

    胡凤琦, 胡洁, 卓丽, 等. 重庆市涪陵工业园区优先评估化学品名录筛查[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2020, 43(S2):262-270

    Hu F Q, Hu J, Zhuo L, et al. Screening on the list of priority assessment chemicals in Fuling industrial park, Chongqing[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2020, 43(S2):262-270(in Chinese)

    Li Y, Wu L Y, Han Q, et al. Estimation of remote sensing based ecological index along the Grand Canal based on PCA-AHP-TOPSIS methodology[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 122:107214
    朱菲菲, 秦普丰, 张娟, 等. 我国地下水环境优先控制有机污染物的筛选[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2013, 3(5):443-450

    Zhu F F, Qin P F, Zhang J, et al. Screening of priority organic pollutants in groundwater of China[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2013, 3(5):443-450(in Chinese)

    段思聪. 河北省流域水环境优先控制污染物筛选方法研究[J]. 煤炭与化工, 2017, 40(11):146-150

    , 160 Duan S C. Study on screening method of pollutants in water environment priority control in Hebei Province[J]. Coal and Chemical Industry, 2017, 40(11):146-150, 160(in Chinese)

    刘子琦, 郭炳晖, 程臻, 等. 基于熵值模糊层次分析法的科技战略评价[J]. 计算机科学, 2020, 47(S1):1-5

    Liu Z Q, Guo B H, Cheng Z, et al. Science and technology strategy evaluation based on entropy fuzzy AHP[J]. Computer Science, 2020, 47(S1):1-5(in Chinese)

    Joshi R, Banwet D K, Shankar R. A Delphi-AHP-TOPSIS based benchmarking framework for performance improvement of a cold chain[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(8):10170-10182
    Amiri V, Kamrani S, Ahmad A, et al. Groundwater quality evaluation using Shannon information theory and human health risk assessment in Yazd Province, central plateau of Iran[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28(1):1108-1130
    Li P Y, Qian H, Wu J H. Application of set pair analysis method based on entropy weight in groundwater quality assessment-A case study in Dongsheng City, northwest China[J]. E-Journal of Chemistry, 2011, 8:879683
    United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Estimation Program Interface (EPI) Suite. EPA.2013.[CP].[2021-11-09]. http://www2.epa.gov/tscascreening-tools/epi-suitetm-estimation-program-interface. Last accessed 25/9/2015
    卜庆伟, 王东红, 王子健. 基于风险分析的流域优先有机污染物筛查:方法构建[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2016, 11(1):61-69

    Bu Q W, Wang D H, Wang Z J. A risk-based screening approach for priority organic contaminants at the watershed scale:Method development[J]. Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2016, 11(1):61-69(in Chinese)

    European Chemicals Agency. Technical problems with ECHA's public chemicals database[EB/OL].[2021-11-09]. https://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals
    Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Categorization results from the Canadian domestic substance list[EB/OL].[2021-11-09]. https://canadachemicals.oecd.org/
    International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Agents classified by the IARC monographs, volumes 1-132[R]. Lyon:IARC, 2022
    Volz N, Greim H, Hartwig A. Permanent Senate Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area-An example about the procedure in threshold[R]. Permanent Senate Commission, 2015
    National Institute of Technology and Evaluation (Japan). GHS Information[EB/OL].[2021-11-08]. https://www.nite.go.jp/chem/
    蔡杨, 李伟, 左雪燕, 等. 盐城滨海湿地土壤多环芳烃分布特征及影响因素[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(6):1249-1259

    Cai Y, Li W, Zuo X Y, et al. Distribution characteristics and influencing factors of PAHs in Yancheng coastal wetland soil[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 30(6):1249-1259(in Chinese)

    汪庆庆, 马小莹, 徐斌, 等. 江苏四城市PM2.5中多环芳烃室外呼吸暴露健康风险评估[J]. 江苏预防医学, 2018, 29(2):140-144

    , 207 Wang Q Q, Ma X Y, Xu B, et al. Outdoor inhalation exposure risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons among PM2.5 in 4 Cities of Jiangsu Province[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2018, 29(2):140-144, 207(in Chinese)

    He H, Hu G J, Sun C, et al. Trace analysis of persistent toxic substances in the main stream of Jiangsu section of the Yangtze River, China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2011, 18(4):638-648
    Liu P, Wu C H, Chang X L, et al. Assessment of chlorpyrifos exposure and absorbed daily doses among infants living in an agricultural area of the Province of Jiangsu, China[J]. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 2014, 87(7):753-762
    倪攀, 华一江, 杨海兵, 等. 苏州地区城乡生活饮用水水质调查与分析[J]. 环境卫生学杂志, 2011, 1(4):10-13

    Ni P, Hua Y J, Yang H B, et al. Analysis and investigation on the quality of drinking water in Suzhou urban and rural areas[J]. Journal of Environmental Hygiene, 2011, 1(4):10-13(in Chinese)

    中华人民共和国环境保护部. 优先控制化学品名录(第一批)[S]. 北京:中华人民共和国环境保护部, 2017
    中华人民共和国生态环境部. 优先控制化学品名录(第二批)[S]. 北京:中华人民共和国生态环境部, 2020
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1751
  • HTML全文浏览数:  1751
  • PDF下载数:  42
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-11-09

基于逼近理想解排序的江苏省优先控制毒害有机化学物质筛查研究

    通讯作者: 刘伟, E-mail: jshblw@126.com
    作者简介: 王伟霞(1982—),女,高级工程师,研究方向为化学品及固体废物污染防治,E-mail:wangweixia@jsep.com
  • 1. 江苏省环境科学研究院, 江苏省环境工程重点实验室, 南京 210036;
  • 2. 江苏省环境工程技术有限公司, 南京 210000
基金项目:

江苏省科技计划社会发展项目(BE2021731);江苏省生态环境科研课题(2020002)

摘要: 基于“优先控制”策略,筛选高产量、高环境健康风险的毒害有机化学物质,优先开展环境管理,是有效防控毒害化学物质环境健康风险的重要手段之一。本研究结合逼近理想解排序技术(TOPSIS)、层次分析法(AHP)和熵值法(Entropy),构建了优先控制毒害有机化学物质的筛查体系,并用于确定江苏省优先控制毒害有机化学物质清单。筛查体系流程包括:(1)江苏省毒害有机化学物质清单的建立;(2)从物质的释放、暴露和危害潜力3个角度,选取17个评价指标,建立综合风险评估层次结构模型;(3)基于AHP-Entropy,计算各指标权重值;(4)利用TOPSIS开展毒害有机化学物质优先级排序,确定江苏省优先控制毒害有机化学物质清单。筛查结果显示,江苏省毒害有机化学物质257种,其中综合风险评分前5%的物质(13种)纳入江苏省优先控制毒害化学物质清单。优控清单中,11种物质已列入国内外管控名录,纳入率为84.6%。其中,蒽、邻甲苯胺、六溴环十二烷、苯、乙醛、甲醛和四氯乙烯已纳入我国优先控制化学品清单。该结果表明,本研究构建的优控毒害有机化学物质筛查体系较为合理。本研究构建的筛查体系,有助于管理部门快速识别区域优控毒害有机化学物质,为新污染物治理奠定重要基础。

English Abstract

参考文献 (28)

目录

/

返回文章
返回